> We've recently added these features:
> [...]
> - Security up through TLS 1.0 (SSL 3.1).
uhhhhhhhh, isn't this removed from Firefox for having security holes fixed in later versions of the TLS spec?
How does it compare (feature-wise, performance, stability) with e.g. hunchentoot (which clearly wins the naming contest)?
I think this runs only with Allegro Common Lisp, a commercial implementation.
Not really, you can run this under SBCL too.
I need another hint. The sources seem to depend on Allegro specifics, e.g. the :excl package (with the enlightening description "General extensions to Common Lisp").
You can load :aserve from qucklisp to get a portable fork of AllegroServe that works with sbcl (or at least it appears to at first glance on my copy of SBCL 2.2.6).
The README distributed with the library offers a little guidance to getting started.
Yes, AllegroServe is Allegro specific, but there is Portable AllegroServe: http://portableaserve.sourceforge.net/
It's the same situation as OpenSSH. OpenSSH only runs on OpenBSD, and Portable OpenSSH is maintained separately.
I'd also be interested in a feature comparison against Swish (https://github.com/becls/swish), but I'm not actually familiar enough with either to make the comparison myself.
That line is about twelve years old, per git blame. Typically, I’d use a reverse proxy to handle HTTPS anyways.